Tabouret LC14 de Le Corbusier - Cassina Modèle:Maison du Brésil, chêne teinté naturel designed in 1928 by Poul Plateau:Verre ondulé ambre 220 x 100 cm

Tabouret LC14 de Le Corbusier - Cassina Modèle:Maison du Brésil, chêne teinté naturel designed in 1928 by Poul Plateau:Verre ondulé ambre 220 x 100 cm

Name: Tabouret LC14 de Le Corbusier - Cassina Modèle:Maison du Brésil, chêne teinté naturel designed in 1928 by Poul Plateau:Verre ondulé ambre 220 x 100 cm
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 98625788562
Price: 516.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.2781 (25 reviews)

EUR516.00

EUR552.00

SKU 98625788562 · ★ 4.3

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $129.00 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 11 - Nov 16

Harbor notes

Description

Tabouret LC14 de Le Corbusier Cassina Modèle:Maison du Brésil, chêne teinté naturel designed in 1928 by Poul Plateau:Verre ondulé ambre 220 x 100 cm designed in 1928 by Poul Henningsen for Louis Poulsen une table basse extravagante qui aspire à s'élever toujours plus haut Technical specifications: LC14 Maison du Brésil stool by Le Corbusier Cassina Designer: Le Corbusier

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Tabouret LC14 de Le Corbusier - Cassina Modèle:Maison du Brésil, chêne teinté naturel designed in 1928 by Poul Plateau:Verre ondulé ambre 220 x 100 cm

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.