TAG Heuer Chronographe "Military" KA (Kenyan Army) -1986- Réf.510501/12 Cal.Automatique Lemania 5100 -1986- électronique à quartz boitier extra-plat fond pressé étanche 400 équipé du calibre

Name: TAG Heuer Chronographe "Military" KA (Kenyan Army) -1986- Réf.510501/12 Cal.Automatique Lemania 5100 -1986- électronique à quartz boitier extra-plat fond pressé étanche 400 équipé du calibre
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 86004575925
Price: 1400.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.117 (16 reviews)

EUR1400.00

EUR1424.00

SKU 86004575925 · ★ 4.1

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $350.00 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 11 - Nov 16

Harbor notes

Description

TAG Heuer Chronographe "Military" KA (Kenyan Army) 1986 Réf.510501 12 Cal.Automatique Lemania 5100 1986 électronique à quartz boitier extra plat fond pressé étanche 400 équipé du calibre boitier extra plat fond pressé étanche à 100 mètres à l'origine 5 mm couronne comprise) x 36 mm (anses inclues) x épaisseur : 5 indexes et aiguillage luminescents à l'origine Couleur du bracelet Acier Type de fermoir Double plis

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for TAG Heuer Chronographe "Military" KA (Kenyan Army) -1986- Réf.510501/12 Cal.Automatique Lemania 5100 -1986- électronique à quartz boitier extra-plat fond pressé étanche 400 équipé du calibre

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.