Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 3/26 - 80 ER 40 Rainure en T Diamètre min de tournage Ø Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 3/26 - 80 ER 40 Rainure en T Diamètre min de tournage Ø Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 3/26 - 80 ER 40 Rainure en T Diamètre min de tournage Ø Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 85506706116
Price: 120.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.351 (24 reviews)

EUR120.00

EUR152.00

SKU 85506706116 · ★ 4.4

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $30.00 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 11 - Nov 16

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 3 26 80 ER 40 Rainure en T Diamètre min de tournage Ø Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Diamètre min de tournage Ø Min mm 6 Distance sur plat H 11 Type de tige Avec surfaces de serrage Sens de coupe Droite Longueur totale L1 mm 180 Diamètre de serrage d mm 20 Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 50 Type de pince 472E ER 40 Serrage minimum 3 Serrage maximum 26 LPR 80 DLN 63 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 503

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 3/26 - 80 ER 40 Rainure en T Diamètre min de tournage Ø Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.