Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/13 - 160 ER 20 snex Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/13 - 160 ER 20 snex Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/13 - 160 ER 20 snex Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 85039421990
Price: 172.90 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.4869 (9 reviews)

EUR172.90

EUR222.90

SKU 85039421990 · ★ 4.5

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $43.23 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 10 - Nov 15

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 2 13 160 ER 20 snex Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Diamètre de coupe D (mm) 11 Diamètre de queue D2 (mm) 12 Longueur de coupe L1 (mm) 50 Longueur totale L2 (mm) 120 Dents Z 6 Tolérance de queue h6 MD Revêtement TiAln Diamètre de coupe D mm 12 Angle de coupe θ mm 90° Longueur utile L1 mm 6 Longueur totale L2 mm 75 Diamètre de serrage Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 50 Type de pince 428E ER 20 Serrage minimum 2 Serrage maximum 13 LPR 160 DLN 35 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 503

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/13 - 160 ER 20 snex Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.