Compresseur A Piston Cuve 100Lt 10Bars Vvm 21/100 122250 Lacme aspiro-souffleur 2760 Diamètre nominal standard DN

Compresseur A Piston Cuve 100Lt 10Bars Vvm 21/100 122250 Lacme aspiro-souffleur 2760 Diamètre nominal standard DN

Name: Compresseur A Piston Cuve 100Lt 10Bars Vvm 21/100 122250 Lacme aspiro-souffleur 2760 Diamètre nominal standard DN
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 8089686744
Price: 529.20 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0783 (19 reviews)

EUR529.20

EUR554.20

SKU 8089686744 · ★ 4.1

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $132.30 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 9 - Nov 14

Harbor notes

Description

Compresseur A Piston Cuve 100Lt 10Bars Vvm 21 100 122250 Lacme aspiro souffleur 2760 Diamètre nominal standard DN 2760 Diamètre nominal standard DN 40 Longueur câble (m) 10 Niveau de pression acoustique (dB A) 73 Matériau de la cuve PVC Nombre de phases (Ph) 1 Fréquence (Hz) 50 60 Tension (V) 220 240 Poids (sans accessoires) (kg) 20 Dimensions (l x L x h) (mm) 600 x 480 x 920 2 x 350 33 1Kg Compresseur mobile Vertical PRIMAIR VMM 21 100 à courroie 21 m³ h Groupe fonte bicylindre en Volts Moteur 3 CV Monophasé 230 V Cuve 100 litres 10 bars 1 sortie raccord rapide régulée sur détendeur micron

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Compresseur A Piston Cuve 100Lt 10Bars Vvm 21/100 122250 Lacme aspiro-souffleur 2760 Diamètre nominal standard DN

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.