Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/20 - 200 ER 32 Taille type:ISO 50 - AD/AF (AD/B) Diamètre de coupe D mm Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/20 - 200 ER 32 Taille type:ISO 50 - AD/AF (AD/B) Diamètre de coupe D mm Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/20 - 200 ER 32 Taille type:ISO 50 - AD/AF (AD/B) Diamètre de coupe D mm Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 64577273465
Price: 112.40 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0288 (18 reviews)

EUR112.40

EUR159.40

SKU 64577273465 · ★ 4.0

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $28.10 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 11 - Nov 16

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 2 20 200 ER 32 Taille type:ISO 50 AD AF (AD B) Diamètre de coupe D mm Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Diamètre de coupe D mm 10 Diamètre de queue D2 mm 10 Longueur de coupe L1 mm 40 Longueur totale L2 mm 100 Dents Z 3 Tolérance de queue Dents Z 2 Tolérance de queue Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 50 Type de pince 470E ER 32 Serrage minimum 2 Serrage maximum 20 LPR 200 DLN 50 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 503

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 50 - 2/20 - 200 ER 32 Taille type:ISO 50 - AD/AF (AD/B) Diamètre de coupe D mm Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.