Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 130 ER 40 Plage de serrage:3-26 Ød2 mm 48 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 130 ER 40 Plage de serrage:3-26 Ød2 mm 48 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 130 ER 40 Plage de serrage:3-26 Ød2 mm 48 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 51653192850
Price: 116.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.2916 (11 reviews)

EUR116.00

EUR165.00

SKU 51653192850 · ★ 4.3

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $29.00 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 12 - Nov 17

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 3 26 130 ER 40 Plage de serrage:3 26 Ød2 mm 48 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Ød2 mm 48 Longueur utile l1 mm 152 Longueur de serrage l2 mm 70 Longueur total L mm 252 Arrosage interne Oui Longueur de coupe L1 mm 30 Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 40 Type de pince 472E ER 40 Serrage minimum 3 Serrage maximum 26 LPR 130 DLN 63 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 403

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 130 ER 40 Plage de serrage:3-26 Ød2 mm 48 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.