Omega Seamaster Mariner 1 Megaquartz 32khz -1976- Réf. 196.0054 / 396.0840 Cal. 1310 -1976- 1950-1959 2989 équipé du calibre Valjoux 400 équipé du calibre

Omega Seamaster Mariner 1 Megaquartz 32khz -1976- Réf. 196.0054 / 396.0840 Cal. 1310 -1976- 1950-1959 2989 équipé du calibre Valjoux 400 équipé du calibre

Name: Omega Seamaster Mariner 1 Megaquartz 32khz -1976- Réf. 196.0054 / 396.0840 Cal. 1310 -1976- 1950-1959 2989 équipé du calibre Valjoux 400 équipé du calibre
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 46546117926
Price: 725.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.4527 (27 reviews)

EUR725.00

EUR757.00

SKU 46546117926 · ★ 4.5

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $181.25 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 13 - Nov 18

Harbor notes

Description

Omega Seamaster Mariner 1 Megaquartz 32khz 1976 Réf. 196.0054 396.0840 Cal. 1310 1976 1950 1959 2989 équipé du calibre Valjoux 400 équipé du calibre 2989 équipé du calibre Valjoux 7750 fonctions additions des heures et minutes (30 min) étonnante montre réveil en acier et or 14 kts réf indexes bâtons appliqués et aiguillage luminescents à l’origine Service : 04 2023

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Omega Seamaster Mariner 1 Megaquartz 32khz -1976- Réf. 196.0054 / 396.0840 Cal. 1310 -1976- 1950-1959 2989 équipé du calibre Valjoux 400 équipé du calibre

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.