AUDISON APBMW K4E – Kit 2 voies BMW – 100 W Peak – 4 Ohm double This model is designed with 12V - 24V:24V

AUDISON APBMW K4E – Kit 2 voies BMW – 100 W Peak – 4 Ohm double This model is designed with 12V - 24V:24V

Name: AUDISON APBMW K4E – Kit 2 voies BMW – 100 W Peak – 4 Ohm double This model is designed with 12V - 24V:24V
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 45874640262
Price: 118.50 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5769 (27 reviews)

EUR118.50

EUR150.50

SKU 45874640262 · ★ 4.6

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $29.62 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 9 - Nov 14

Harbor notes

Description

AUDISON APBMW K4E – Kit 2 voies BMW – 100 W Peak – 4 Ohm double This model is designed with 12V 24V:24V This model is designed with a foam surround for the woofer and a PEI surround for the midrange Leur tweeter intégré de 21 mm est étudié pour offrir un son équilibré : clair et précis pour le conducteur et le passager text align: left Caractéristique Détail Taille Woofer 100 mm (4 in) Impédance 4 Ohm Puissance Peak 100 W Puissance Continue 50 W Réponse en fréquence 90 ÷ 23k Hz Diamètre bobine 25 mm Taille aimant 50 x 29 x 3 mm Ajustement crossover 3

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for AUDISON APBMW K4E – Kit 2 voies BMW – 100 W Peak – 4 Ohm double This model is designed with 12V - 24V:24V

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.