Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/20 - 70 ER 32 Plage de serrage:2-20 100 Sens de coupe droite Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/20 - 70 ER 32 Plage de serrage:2-20 100 Sens de coupe droite Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/20 - 70 ER 32 Plage de serrage:2-20 100 Sens de coupe droite Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 39374322795
Price: 64.50 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.6984 (9 reviews)

EUR64.50

EUR91.50

SKU 39374322795 · ★ 4.7

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $16.12 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 10 - Nov 15

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 2 20 70 ER 32 Plage de serrage:2 20 100 Sens de coupe droite Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 100 Sens de coupe droite Diamètre de serrage d mm 11 Type de tige Queue cylindrique K mm 9 KI mm 12 Longueur de l'arête de coupe Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 40 Type de pince 470E ER 32 Serrage minimum 2 Serrage maximum 20 LPR 70 DLN 50 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 402

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/20 - 70 ER 32 Plage de serrage:2-20 100 Sens de coupe droite Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.