Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 200 | ER 40 403.02.20.1 Longueur totale L mm 300 Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 200 | ER 40 403.02.20.1 Longueur totale L mm 300 Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 200 | ER 40 403.02.20.1 Longueur totale L mm 300 Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 3553769325
Price: 182.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0891 (19 reviews)

EUR182.00

EUR203.00

SKU 3553769325 · ★ 4.1

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $45.50 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 9 - Nov 14

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 3 26 200 ER 40 403.02.20.1 Longueur totale L mm 300 Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Longueur totale L mm 300 Distance sur plat H mm 23 Diamètre de serrage d mm 25 Diamètre minimal de tournage D Diamètre de coupe D mm 8 Diamètre de queue D2 mm 8 Longueur de coupe L1 mm 20 Longueur totale L2 mm 65 Dents Z 3 Tolérance de queue Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 40 Type de pince 472E ER 40 Serrage minimum 3 Serrage maximum 26 LPR 200 DLN 63 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 403

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 3/26 - 200 | ER 40 403.02.20.1 Longueur totale L mm 300 Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.