Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 | ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD/B 95 Diamètre de serrage d Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 | ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD/B 95 Diamètre de serrage d Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 | ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD/B 95 Diamètre de serrage d Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 23240832389
Price: 59.90 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.6633 (12 reviews)

EUR59.90

EUR97.90

SKU 23240832389 · ★ 4.7

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $14.97 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 10 - Nov 15

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 1 10 63 ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 AD B 95 Diamètre de serrage d Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 95 Diamètre de serrage d mm 6 Longueur totale L mm 58 Fournisseur JD Tools Classification des matières usinables Conditions de coupe P🔵M🟡S🟠K🔴 Matière de l'outil Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 40 Type de pince 426E ER 16 Serrage minimum 1 Serrage maximum 10 LPR 63 DLN 32 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 403

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 | ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD/B 95 Diamètre de serrage d Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.