Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/13 - 100 ER 20 402.02.10.1 Ød2 mm 58 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/13 - 100 ER 20 402.02.10.1 Ød2 mm 58 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/13 - 100 ER 20 402.02.10.1 Ød2 mm 58 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 2193519583
Price: 69.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.3654 (14 reviews)

EUR69.00

EUR107.00

SKU 2193519583 · ★ 4.4

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $17.25 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 9 - Nov 14

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 2 13 100 ER 20 402.02.10.1 Ød2 mm 58 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Ød2 mm 58 Longueur utile l1 mm 99 Longueur de serrage l2 mm 70 Longueur total L mm 206 Arrosage interne Oui Diamètre de coupe ØD mm 25 Diamètre de queue Ød1 mm 32 Grand diamètre Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 40 Type de pince 428E ER 20 Serrage minimum 2 Serrage maximum 13 LPR 100 DLN 35 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 402

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 2/13 - 100 ER 20 402.02.10.1 Ød2 mm 58 Longueur utile Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.