Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 20994774342
Price: 61.90 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.4590000000000005 (20 reviews)

EUR61.90

EUR99.90

SKU 20994774342 · ★ 4.5

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $15.47 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 9 - Nov 14

Harbor notes

Description

Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 1 10 63 ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 AD Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Diamètre de coupe D (mm) 6 140 Sens de coupe droite Diamètre de serrage d mm 16 Type de tige Queue cylindrique K mm 12 Ki mm 15 Application: Fournisseur Kemmler Type de porte outils Mandrin à pinces ER Taille Type SK 40 Type de pince 426E ER 16 Serrage minimum 1 Serrage maximum 10 LPR 63 DLN 32 Fichier 2D PDF Fichier 3D stp Numéro d'article d'origine 402

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Mandrin à pinces ER SK 40 - 1/10 - 63 ER 16 Taille type:ISO 40 - AD Diamètre de coupe D (mm) Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.