Fraise à fileter MTZ 06048 C10 1.0 ISO MT7 intérieur Type de filetage:M6-MF8 Matière de l'outil MD Nuance Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Fraise à fileter MTZ 06048 C10 1.0 ISO MT7 intérieur Type de filetage:M6-MF8 Matière de l'outil MD Nuance Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

Name: Fraise à fileter MTZ 06048 C10 1.0 ISO MT7 intérieur Type de filetage:M6-MF8 Matière de l'outil MD Nuance Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060
Brand: www.ihc-sa.com
SKU: 11558723181
Price: 199.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.3924 (20 reviews)

EUR199.00

EUR246.00

SKU 11558723181 · ★ 4.4

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $49.75 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 12 - Nov 17

Harbor notes

Description

Fraise à fileter MTZ 06048 C10 1.0 ISO MT7 intérieur Type de filetage:M6 MF8 Matière de l'outil MD Nuance Revêtement:Non revêtue CES302060 Matière de l'outil MD Nuance info nuances Identification des plaquettes XEKT 19M520 01 10 Diamètre de queue D2 mm 10 Longueur totale L2 mm 100 Longueur de coupe L1 mm 18 Dents Z 2 Tolérance de queue Type de filetage ISO 60 M6 MF8 Diamètre de coupe D mm 4 Diamètre de serrage d mm 6

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Fraise à fileter MTZ 06048 C10 1.0 ISO MT7 intérieur Type de filetage:M6-MF8 Matière de l'outil MD Nuance Revêtement:Non revêtue- CES302060

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Do not infer functionality from a decorative presentation element. Avoid treating staged context as part of the purchase.

What should I record if a purchase-related problem happens only sometimes?

Describe how the issue affects your intended use when it occurs. Use the observed sequence to explain the uncertainty accurately.

How can I request another review of an unresolved support issue?

Distinguish disagreement with a decision from a missing factual explanation. Focus the request on the specific unresolved issue and relevant evidence.